News
Compaction and Transmembrane Delivery of pDNA: Differences between l-PEI and Two Types of Amphiphilic Block Copolymers
15.02.2017
Compaction and Transmembrane Delivery of pDNA: Differences between l-PEI and Two Types of Amphiphilic Block Copolymers
A.Raup, H. Wang, C.V. Synatschke, V.Jérôme, S.Agarwal, D.V. Pergushov, A. Müller and R.Freitag Biomacromolecules 2017, 18 (3), pp 808–818.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb328/cb32818a5ab3a686c92a0c85ad92d49fd6cda5e7" alt=""
Polycations are popular agents for nonviral delivery of DNA to mammalian cells. Adding hydrophobic, biodegradable, or cell-penetrating functions could help to improve their performance, which at present is below that of viral agents. A crucial first step in gene delivery is the complexation of the DNA. The characteristics of these “polyplexes” presumably influence or even determine the subsequent steps of membrane passage, intracellular traveling/DNA release, and nuclear uptake. Herein, polyplexes formed with linear poly(ethylenimine) (l-PEI) are compared to complexes generated with functionalized diblock copolymers. While l-PEI interacts only electrostatically with the DNA, interaction in the case of the diblock polymers may be mixed-mode. In certain cases, transfection efficiency improved when the polyplexes were formed in hypertonic solution. Moreover, whereas conventional PEI-based polyplexes enter the cells via endocytosis, at least one of the diblock agents seemed to promote entry via transient destabilization of the plasma membrane.